There is a conference in Paris on 23-24 September this year. I do not want to go for several reasons.
How do you say "no" to your boss and it means "yes" to him
Sunday, August 22, 2010
The art of saying it
Saturday, August 21, 2010
A New Beginning
I watched Julie & Julia last night. It was quite entertaining considering the film is an adaption from two books.
It makes me realized that I did not have short term goals for the last three years. I need to do some listing. Then I will come out from this doldrum
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Sunday, March 8, 2009
'Rethinking the War for Talent'
Four scenario presented:
- EE with generic knowledge or low startegic importance leaves to join competitors - defensive maneuvers such as improving the benefits to retain them. Reason: hamper over all productivity
- EE with low strategic importance knowledge departs to join cooperators - relational action such as formation of alumni program. Reason: administrative & human-capital costs vs. social-capital benefits. New biz opportunity may be generated
- EE with high strategic importance knowledge leaves to take jobs with competitors - retaliatory action such as non-solicitation clause + defensive maneuvers (for the crucial contributors). Reason: The most damaging of turnover
- EE with high strategic importance knowledge leaves to join cooperators - hybrid appes such as maintaining positive relationship with the departing ee, strong incentive to reduce turnover, expand the social capital & networking.
Monday, April 14, 2008
Knowledge Management Function

One of the trends in current best practices is to incorporate the knowledge management philosophy within the human capital purview - as a part of people management framework.
What is knowledge management?
You may not be in full agreement with this, or partially concur with this. I am starting to understand this, this & this.
But, some of my colleagues may not totally disagree with this:
Monday, March 24, 2008
Double face
I hate it
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Dealing with Difficult Employees

Whenever you are promoted, there shall always be several discontented voices - especially from staff members who think that they deserved (entitled to) such promotion rather than yourself. (kind of conflict-of-interest?). If you are unlucky, just like me, I have bypassed several other candidates. Candidates who have stayed there for umpteenth years. As a result, they are resentful, incensed with me – figuratively speaking.
I will be playing Mr.-Nice-Guy for the next quarter or so. Let them get over of the self-denial phase.
After that, you will see the truth-o-meter…
Someone may get burned.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Promotion
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Managing Young Professionals
As in most MNCs, the easiest way of ensuring constant supply of talents is via young professional program (YPP) or management trainee program (MTP).
These young turks who has MBA with CGPA of 3.8 and above (magna cumlaude) will undergo rigorous assessments and evaluation processes. In my organization, it shall involve a two-day residential arrangement with the final technical and selection interview at the end. I will share our assessment center arrangement under a different posting in the future.
They essentially good and brainy people. However, there are occasions when I hate myself for managing these YPs. Why?
- They are the best among the best - the cream of the cream. So, rather than showing and demonstrating the desired behaviors of those elites, they use the privilege to whine on every aspects of the organization. They think the world evolves around them.
- They have the "I-know-it-all" attitude. Most of them are smart - no doubt about it. But you can't Google for 30 minutes and suddenly become an subject matter expert on 360 performance evaluation or sukuk requirements in GCC. Please, give me a break!
- They think that organization is responsible 100 percent on their development. HR must develop me. And me, and me. And most of the development program equal to going on a mission overseas (in the meridian longitudes)
At times, I would give them dosages of bitter tonic on productivity and developing own career path.
In a short term basis, a 60km/hr Ferrari is less valuable than a 120km/hr Camry.
Remember that!
Saturday, October 20, 2007
What an Assignment
Sunday, October 7, 2007
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Global Talent Index
Read more information here
I have ordered a copy from Heidrick and Struggles. Watch the space.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Profiles XT
Please read here.
The ProfileXT intrument is measuring an overall job match index (in percentage). It is mesured by combining of three dimensions:
- Thinking Style i.e. aptitude tests on both verbal and numerical (in skill and reasoning). In fact, the composite of these four aptitude tests became the Learning Index - a measure on one capacity in adapting/learning. Please note that there is a job match percentage based on the thinking style as well.
- Behavioral Traits i.e. the pschometric assessment itself. It consists of nine traits i.e. Energy, Assertiveness, Sociability, Manageability, Attitude, Decisiveness, Accomodating, Independence, and Objective Thinking. Please note that there is a job match percentage based on these traits as well.
- Occupational Interests i.e. ranking interest of six areas: Enterprising, Financial/Admninistrative, People Service, Technical, Mechanical, Creative
Friday, September 7, 2007
Budget 2008
Full Budget 2008 text here
There are several serious implications on the recruitment & talent management philosophy in any PLCs that I can think of. Cuma tak sure either it is for better or worse.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Resourcefulness
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
The Future of Human Resource Management
- Understanding & Managing People
- Invest in the Next HR Professionals
- Master the New Role
- Adapt Culture to Business Conditions
- Organization as Capabilities not Structure
- HR Decision - Craft, Science, Art
- Social Expectation, Public Policy and Ethics
- Global Life, Local Act
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Occupational Personality Questionnaires (OPQ32)
- A suite of questionnaire designed to assess the typical or preferred behavior of individuals in a way that is relevant to the world of work
- Variety of applications mainly for selection, development, team-building and counseling
OPQ32i forces people to make a choice between most and least preferred aspects of their personalities - Controlling distortion due to response bias
The 32 dimensions measure the followings:
Relationship with People
1. Influence - Persuasive, Controlling, Outspoken, & Independent Mind
2. Sociability - Outgoing, Affiliative, & Socially Confident
3. Empathy - Modest, Democratic, & Caring
Thinking Style
4. Analysis - Data Rational, Evaluative, & Behavioral
5. Creativity & Change - Conventional, Conceptual, Innovative, Variety Seeking, & Adaptable
6. Structure - Forward Thinking, Detail Conscious, Conscientious, & Rule Following
Feelings and Emotions
7. Emotion - Relax, Worrying, Tough Minded, Optimistic, Trusting, & Emotionally Controlled
8. Dynamism - Vigorous, Competitive, Achieving, & Decisive
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Organization Transformation
- Your organization's top management has created a 15-year-blueprint. The new direction setting has redefined your organization's existing vision, mission, and strategies
- Next action item is to operationalize those long-term strategies. Realignment to the line of sight. Convert the abstracts into measurable milestones. In the meantime, your organization may need to transform the current structure, process, system, policy, and people (cannot use the old presumptions, anymore)
- Unfortunately, your organization does not possess internal capability to spearhead such transformation from within. Credibility (of the HR Department) is also an issue. Thus, the top management has created a Request for Proposal (RfP) and invited seven world-class transformation consulting firm to participate in the project. In the end, only four firms submitted the final proposal
- A technical evaluation committee (TEC) is entrusted to review and evaluate the proposals. Besides teh normal criteria, it is also an option for the TEC to reject all proposals, if none deems fit the requirements
- You are appointed as one of the members of TEC. You are also supposed to provide your 'subject-matter-expert' on the "people and competence" aspect of the proposal
Upon the review and evaluation of the consulting firms, you find out that only two organizations worth to be considered. Shortlisted process began. Final recommendation on one firm was made and submitted to the approving body.
The approving body requested TEC to reconsider the other two proposals that have not been shortlisted in the first place.
Do you agree with the approving body?
Why?






